H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Paolo Bertolucci H2H: 1-0
Bill Scanlon holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Bertolucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1980 Milan third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 74
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1980* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-1 6-2 | Paolo Bertolucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Paolo Bertolucci | #382 | #12 | 0 | 1,930 | 198 | 150 | 56.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Paolo Bertolucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #50 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #158 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #72 | 1,761 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,657 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #285 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |