Bill Scanlon
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 9 | 12 | Jul 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 9 | 10 | Apr 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 6 | 3 | 9 | Jul 29, 1980 | — |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Ramesh Krishnan holds a 3–2 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ramesh Krishnan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1989 Cincinnati Open round of 64 1-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramesh Krishnan | 1-6 6-3 7-6 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Aug 16, 1989* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 6-3 7-6 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Sep 24, 1983* | QF | San Francisco | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-2 | Ramesh Krishnan | Match data | Aug 17, 1983* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Bill Scanlon | 6-3 6-3 | Ramesh Krishnan | Match data | Aug 20, 1981* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Jun 25, 1980* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,018 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Ramesh Krishnan | — | — | — | 1,892 | 278 | 249 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Ramesh Krishnan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,849 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,599 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Ramesh Krishnan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 20 | 1977 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1981 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 1978 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1982 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1979 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1983 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 23 | 1980 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 1984 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 24 | 1981 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 1985 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1982 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1986 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% |
| 26 | 1983 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 1987 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1988 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1989 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 1986 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1990 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 30 | 1987 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1991 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 31 | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 107 | 85 | 192 | 55.7% | 34 | 47 | 81 | 42.0% | 59 | 41 | 100 | 59.0% | 107 | 86 | 193 | 55.4% | — | 157 | 119 | 276 | 56.9% | 33 | 53 | 86 | 38.4% | 42 | 33 | 75 | 56.0% | 46 | 44 | 90 | 51.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Ramesh Krishnan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1486 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.19 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1537 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +16 | — | 54.5% | +0.18 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.02 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1584 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | +55 | -24 | — | 39.6% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -0.61 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1654 | 142.6 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -5 | — | 48.0% | -0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.46 | 1980 | 1713 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -93 | -153 | 50.8% | -0.03 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.73 |
| 20 | 1977 | 1725 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -86 | -47 | 51.5% | 0.00 | 14–7 (67%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | +2.62 | 1981 | 1755 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -135 | — | 45.1% | -0.38 | 4–7 (36%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +0.22 |
| 21 | 1978 | 1766 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -179 | — | 40.9% | -0.83 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -1.30 | 1982 | 1742 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -23 | -190 | 47.3% | -0.16 | 9–3 (75%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -0.02 |
| 22 | 1979 | 1838 | 143.2 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -227 | -82 | 58.0% | +0.56 | 4–6 (40%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | +1.44 | 1983 | 1749 | 145.4 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -115 | -80 | 49.0% | +0.04 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.76 |
| 23 | 1980 | 1810 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -150 | -29 | 52.8% | +0.11 | 17–12 (59%) | 14–14 (50%) | — | -5.33 | 1984 | 1843 | 148.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -224 | -106 | 58.9% | +0.72 | 11–6 (65%) | 7–15 (32%) | — | -0.71 |
| 24 | 1981 | 1881 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | -101 | 60.1% | +0.75 | 9–4 (69%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | -0.11 | 1985 | 1806 | 149.5 | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | +12 | 50.5% | +0.04 | 10–6 (63%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -1.37 |
| 25 | 1982 | 1850 | 150.4 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -212 | — | 50.7% | -0.13 | 10–9 (53%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -0.56 | 1986 | 1846 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -288 | +69 | 58.3% | +0.70 | 7–10 (41%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +1.08 |
| 26 | 1983 | 1925 | 157.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -244 | -85 | 61.4% | +0.77 | 13–5 (72%) | 11–15 (42%) | — | -3.38 | 1987 | 1790 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | +30 | 56.5% | +0.43 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +0.98 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1830 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -125 | +21 | 51.6% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | +0.20 | 1988 | 1758 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | +34 | 60.2% | +0.74 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.37 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1669 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | +90 | — | +99 | 39.6% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | +0.21 | 1989 | 1717 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 54.4% | +0.36 | 4–6 (40%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +0.03 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1657 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | +146 | 50.0% | +0.23 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +2.27 | 1990 | 1699 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | +16 | 50.0% | +0.07 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | -1.38 |
| 30 | 1987 | 1562 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | +169 | 42.7% | -0.44 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | +2.59 | 1991 | 1583 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | — | 41.0% | -0.71 | 2–7 (22%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.16 |
| 31 | 1988 | 1535 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | +156 | 40.0% | -0.86 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.45 | 1992 | 1616 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | — | 40.9% | -0.23 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.81 |
| 32 | 1989 | 1600 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 44.0% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -1.52 | 1993 | 1640 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.39 |
| Career | — | 2018 | 148.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -134 | +24 | 51.7% | +0.09 | 103–80 (56%) | 99–110 (47%) | 102.8 | -0.67 | — | 1893 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -91 | -23 | 52.1% | +0.18 | 89–85 (51%) | 69–75 (48%) | 97.4 | -0.30 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 9 | 12 | Jul 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 9 | 10 | Apr 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 6 | 3 | 9 | Jul 29, 1980 | — |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 9 | 9 | Apr 11, 1991 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 0 | 9 | 9 | Mar 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 7 | 8 | Apr 17, 1987 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Peter Lundgren | 2 | 5 | 7 | Mar 16, 1991 | H2H |