H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 0-2
Raul Ramirez holds a 2–0 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raul Ramirez leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raul Ramirez won the 1981 Richmond Wct third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1981* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raul Ramirez | 6-2 6-4 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1976* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Raul Ramirez | 6-1 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |