H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 2-5

Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–2 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1983 Wembley round of 32 6-7 6-0 6-1.

USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #11 6-7 6-0 6-1 Roscoe Tanner #42 Match data Nov 10, 1983* R32 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
Bill Scanlon #18 6-4 6-4 Roscoe Tanner #57 Match data Aug 6, 1983* QF Columbus ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #18 7-6 7-6 Bill Scanlon #39 Match data Apr 29, 1982* R32 Tampa ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #4 6-7 6-4 6-4 Bill Scanlon #35 Match data Feb 2, 1980* QF Richmond Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #11 6-2 6-2 Bill Scanlon #89 Match data May 24, 1978* R64 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Roscoe Tanner #8 6-2 6-1 Bill Scanlon #34 Match data Jun 10, 1977* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Roscoe Tanner 6-3 6-0 Bill Scanlon Match data Nov 4, 1976* R32 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% 1,479 0 0
18 1970 0–9 0.0% 1,416 0 0
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% 1,706 0 0
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0 1972 29–14 67.4% 1,910 0 0
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bill Scanlon Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4% 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bill Scanlon Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 28.6% -1.14 0–1 -0.17
18 1970 1417 113.2 +103 +73 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.50
19 1976 1654 142.6 -38 -5 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) -0.46 1971 1706 127.5 -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) -0.17
20 1977 1725 137.5 +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) +2.62 1972 1910 135.7 -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) -0.27
21 1978 1766 135.3 +66 -179 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) -1.30 1973 1838 144.5 +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) -3.40
22 1979 1838 143.2 +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) +1.44 1974 1963 154.0 -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) -2.27
23 1980 1810 150.9 +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) -5.33 1975 1972 153.3 +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) -0.74
24 1981 1881 150.7 +56 -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) -0.11 1976 2018 159.4 +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) -2.11
25 1982 1850 150.4 +33 -212 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) -0.56 1977 1890 153.2 -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) -0.49
26 1983 1925 157.4 +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) -3.38 1978 1941 160.3 +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) -1.59
27 1984 1830 139.9 -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) +0.20 1979 2032 164.1 +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) -3.91
28 1985 1669 116.8 +90 +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) +0.21 1980 1997 154.8 +23 +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) -1.79
29 1986 1657 124.4 +15 +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) +2.27 1981 1926 156.1 +117 +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) -0.51
30 1987 1562 119.1 +53 +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) +2.59 1982 1786 138.8 +4 +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) -2.07
31 1988 1535 117.2 +7 +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) -0.45 1983 1874 146.4 -44 +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) -4.29
32 1989 1600 129.3 +18 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 -1.52 1984 1681 120.1 -28 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) -0.69
33 1985 1662 99.2 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 +0.08
Career 2018 148.5 +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67 2162 157.4 +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.