Bill Scanlon
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 9 | 12 | Jul 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 9 | 10 | Apr 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 6 | 3 | 9 | Jul 29, 1980 | — |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–2 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1983 Wembley round of 32 6-7 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | 6-7 6-0 6-1 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data | Nov 10, 1983* | R32 | Wembley | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-4 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data | Aug 6, 1983* | QF | Columbus | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Roscoe Tanner | 7-6 7-6 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Apr 29, 1982* | R32 | Tampa | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Roscoe Tanner | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Feb 2, 1980* | QF | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Roscoe Tanner | 6-2 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | May 24, 1978* | R64 | Italian Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
| Roscoe Tanner | 6-2 6-1 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Jun 10, 1977* | R16 | Eastbourne Open | ATP 250 | Grass |
| Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 6-0 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Nov 4, 1976* | R32 | Japan Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,018 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,162 | 592 | 294 | 66.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,837 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 65–27 | 70.7% | #14 | 1,963 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,018 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,849 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #13 | 1,889 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #11 | 1,940 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,032 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,996 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,925 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,785 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,874 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,599 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,680 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,662 | 1 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1971 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1977 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1972 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 1978 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1973 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% |
| 22 | 1979 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1974 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% |
| 23 | 1980 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 1975 | 27 | 7 | 34 | 79.4% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% |
| 24 | 1981 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 1976 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% |
| 25 | 1982 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1977 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% |
| 26 | 1983 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 1978 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 25 | 9 | 34 | 73.5% |
| 27 | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1979 | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% |
| 28 | 1985 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1980 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% |
| 29 | 1986 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1981 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% |
| 30 | 1987 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1982 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 31 | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1983 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 32 | 1989 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 107 | 85 | 192 | 55.7% | 34 | 47 | 81 | 42.0% | 59 | 41 | 100 | 59.0% | 107 | 86 | 193 | 55.4% | — | 209 | 102 | 311 | 67.2% | 99 | 59 | 158 | 62.7% | 121 | 42 | 163 | 74.2% | 163 | 91 | 254 | 64.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1479 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1417 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | +103 | +73 | — | 13.6% | -1.45 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.50 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1654 | 142.6 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -5 | — | 48.0% | -0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.46 | 1971 | 1706 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -129 | -172 | 56.9% | +0.31 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -0.17 |
| 20 | 1977 | 1725 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -86 | -47 | 51.5% | 0.00 | 14–7 (67%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | +2.62 | 1972 | 1910 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -296 | -167 | 59.5% | +0.43 | 11–3 (79%) | 14–8 (64%) | — | -0.27 |
| 21 | 1978 | 1766 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -179 | — | 40.9% | -0.83 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -1.30 | 1973 | 1838 | 144.5 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -90 | -106 | 56.7% | +0.51 | 11–10 (52%) | 15–15 (50%) | — | -3.40 |
| 22 | 1979 | 1838 | 143.2 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -227 | -82 | 58.0% | +0.56 | 4–6 (40%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | +1.44 | 1974 | 1963 | 154.0 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -226 | +137 | 65.9% | +1.12 | 16–13 (55%) | 15–17 (47%) | — | -2.27 |
| 23 | 1980 | 1810 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -150 | -29 | 52.8% | +0.11 | 17–12 (59%) | 14–14 (50%) | — | -5.33 | 1975 | 1972 | 153.3 | — | — | — | — | +62 | -153 | +164 | 67.7% | +1.19 | 19–14 (58%) | 17–14 (55%) | — | -0.74 |
| 24 | 1981 | 1881 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | -101 | 60.1% | +0.75 | 9–4 (69%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | -0.11 | 1976 | 2018 | 159.4 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -49 | +104 | 66.7% | +1.29 | 18–11 (62%) | 18–20 (47%) | — | -2.11 |
| 25 | 1982 | 1850 | 150.4 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -212 | — | 50.7% | -0.13 | 10–9 (53%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -0.56 | 1977 | 1890 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +22 | +206 | 62.7% | +0.94 | 13–18 (42%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | -0.49 |
| 26 | 1983 | 1925 | 157.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -244 | -85 | 61.4% | +0.77 | 13–5 (72%) | 11–15 (42%) | — | -3.38 | 1978 | 1941 | 160.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -25 | +162 | 67.2% | +1.20 | 10–8 (56%) | 23–10 (70%) | — | -1.59 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1830 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -125 | +21 | 51.6% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | +0.20 | 1979 | 2032 | 164.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -91 | +131 | 71.3% | +1.27 | 13–8 (62%) | 22–14 (61%) | — | -3.91 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1669 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | +90 | — | +99 | 39.6% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | +0.21 | 1980 | 1997 | 154.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +198 | 70.9% | +1.29 | 6–10 (38%) | 17–5 (77%) | — | -1.79 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1657 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | +146 | 50.0% | +0.23 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +2.27 | 1981 | 1926 | 156.1 | — | — | — | — | +117 | — | +82 | 66.0% | +1.02 | 14–9 (61%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | -0.51 |
| 30 | 1987 | 1562 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | +169 | 42.7% | -0.44 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | +2.59 | 1982 | 1786 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | +208 | 51.5% | -0.01 | 9–6 (60%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -2.07 |
| 31 | 1988 | 1535 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | +156 | 40.0% | -0.86 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.45 | 1983 | 1874 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | +125 | 53.4% | +0.14 | 7–5 (58%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | -4.29 |
| 32 | 1989 | 1600 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 44.0% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -1.52 | 1984 | 1681 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -28 | — | — | 25.8% | -1.52 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.69 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1662 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.08 |
| Career | — | 2018 | 148.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -134 | +24 | 51.7% | +0.09 | 103–80 (56%) | 99–110 (47%) | 102.8 | -0.67 | — | 2162 | 157.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -96 | +112 | 63.1% | +0.88 | 155–123 (56%) | 200–155 (56%) | 99.8 | -2.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 9 | 12 | Jul 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 9 | 10 | Apr 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 6 | 3 | 9 | Jul 29, 1980 | — |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Connors | 4 | 17 | 21 | Aug 22, 1984 | H2H |
| Bjorn Borg | 4 | 12 | 16 | Sep 12, 1981 | H2H |
| Brian Teacher | 11 | 3 | 14 | Mar 29, 1984 | H2H |
| Dick Stockton | 9 | 4 | 13 | Sep 23, 1982 | H2H |
| Raul Ramirez | 4 | 9 | 13 | Feb 20, 1982 | H2H |