H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 2-5

Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–2 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1983 Wembley third round 6-7 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 1983* Wembley ATP 250 R32 Carpet Bill Scanlon #11 6-7 6-0 6-1 Roscoe Tanner #42 Match data
Aug 6, 1983* Columbus ATP 250 QF Hard Bill Scanlon #18 6-4 6-4 Roscoe Tanner #57 Match data
Apr 29, 1982* Tampa ATP 250 R32 Hard Roscoe Tanner #18 7-6 7-6 Bill Scanlon #39 Match data
Feb 2, 1980* Richmond Wct ATP 250 QF Carpet Roscoe Tanner #4 6-7 6-4 6-4 Bill Scanlon #35 Match data
May 24, 1978* Rome Masters 1000 R64 Clay Roscoe Tanner #11 6-2 6-2 Bill Scanlon #89 Match data
Jun 10, 1977* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Roscoe Tanner #8 6-2 6-1 Bill Scanlon #34 Match data
Nov 4, 1976* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Roscoe Tanner #11 6-3 6-0 Bill Scanlon #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,017 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,158 595 298 66.6% 1 1 0 0 15 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,417 0 0
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,651 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,703 0 0
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,723 0 0 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,911 0 0
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,764 0 1 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,812 0 0
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,839 0 2 1974 66–28 70.2% #14 1,959 0 2
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,808 0 2 1975 65–24 73.0% #9 1,965 0 5
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,879 0 5 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,012 0 9
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,852 0 6 1977 52–30 63.4% #15 1,880 1 11
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,923 0 6 1978 59–24 71.1% #11 1,935 1 13
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,828 0 6 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,025 1 15
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,668 0 6 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,993 1 16
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,901 1 17
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,779 1 17
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,534 0 7 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,872 1 17
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,598 0 7 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,679 1 17
33 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,661 1 17