H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Scott Mccain H2H: 2-0

Bill Scanlon holds a 2–0 lead over Scott Mccain in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1981 San Francisco round of 32 6-2 6-4.

USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #36 6-2 6-4 Scott Mccain Match data Sep 24, 1981* R32 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Bill Scanlon #25 3-6 7-6 6-7 6-3 6-1 Scott Mccain #203 Match data Jan 1, 1981* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Scott Mccain #628 #122 0 1,571 22 47 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Scott Mccain
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 1980 1–2 33.3% #203 1,514 0 0
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7 1981 6–11 35.3% 1,498 0 0
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7 1982 3–10 23.1% 1,446 0 0
33 1983 3–6 33.3% #187 1,479 0 0
34 1984 6–8 42.9% #167 1,507 0 0
35 1985 3–10 23.1% #271 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bill Scanlon Scott Mccain
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
21 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9%
24 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1985 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4% 10 19 29 34.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 19 27 29.6% 2 3 5 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bill Scanlon Scott Mccain
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1976 1654 142.6 -38 -5 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) -0.46
20 1977 1725 137.5 +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) +2.62
21 1978 1766 135.3 +66 -179 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) -1.30
22 1979 1838 143.2 +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) +1.44
23 1980 1810 150.9 +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) -5.33
24 1981 1881 150.7 +56 -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) -0.11
25 1982 1850 150.4 +33 -212 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) -0.56
26 1983 1925 157.4 +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) -3.38
27 1984 1830 139.9 -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) +0.20
28 1985 1669 116.8 +90 +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) +0.21
29 1986 1657 124.4 +15 +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) +2.27
30 1987 1562 119.1 +53 +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) +2.59 1980 1514 110.6 50.0% -0.40 0–1 1–1 +0.14
31 1988 1535 117.2 +7 +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) -0.45 1981 1498 112.8 +39 +15 +55 41.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) +1.16
32 1989 1600 129.3 +18 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 -1.52 1982 1447 101.4 +62 +42 29.0% -1.39 0–2 2–3 (40%) +0.70
33 1983 1479 120.3 +32 36.8% -0.79 0–1 0–2 -0.04
34 1984 1507 116.5 +70 -75 44.1% -0.15 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) +0.95
35 1985 1466 112.4 +68 -40 25.8% -1.42 0–2 0–1 +0.49
Career 2018 148.5 +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67 1572 117.8 +56 +15 +8 36.8% -0.81 4–13 (24%) 6–13 (32%) 88.4 +4.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.