H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 3-4

Tim Gullikson holds a 4–3 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tim Gullikson leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1983 Wimbledon round of 32 6-4 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main-draw meetings
Tim Gullikson
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #18 6-4 6-4 6-3 Tim Gullikson Match data Jun 26, 1983* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tim Gullikson 6-7 6-1 6-4 Bill Scanlon #41 Match data Feb 18, 1982* R32 Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard
Tim Gullikson 7-5 6-1 Bill Scanlon #39 Match data Jun 17, 1981* R16 Bristol ATP 250 Grass
Bill Scanlon #28 3-6 7-5 6-1 Tim Gullikson Match data Oct 2, 1980* R32 Maui ATP 250 Hard
Bill Scanlon #39 6-4 6-2 Tim Gullikson Match data Mar 28, 1980* R16 Milan ATP 250 Carpet
Tim Gullikson 6-2 6-2 Bill Scanlon Match data Mar 30, 1979* R16 Dayton ATP 250 Carpet
Tim Gullikson 6-3 2-6 6-3 Bill Scanlon Match data Oct 29, 1976* R16 Perth ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Tim Gullikson — — — 2,012 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bill Scanlon Tim Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 1976 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1977 12 5 17 70.6% 10 9 19 52.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 1978 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1979 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 8 14 42.9%
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 11 14 21.4%
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4% — 95 70 165 57.6% 29 32 61 47.5% 54 33 87 62.1% 64 62 126 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bill Scanlon Tim Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1976 1654 142.6 — — — — -38 -5 — 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1725 137.5 — — — — +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) 106.8 +2.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 1766 135.3 — — — — +66 -179 — 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.3 -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1838 143.2 — — — — +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) 98.1 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1810 150.9 — — — — +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) 104.4 -5.33 1975 1526 110.0 — — — — +36 — — 37.5% -1.38 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.56
24 1981 1881 150.7 — — — — +56 — -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) 108.6 -0.11 1976 1587 121.0 — — — — -10 -24 -68 42.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.4 +0.27
25 1982 1850 150.4 — — — — +33 -212 — 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) 104.4 -0.56 1977 1869 146.4 — — — — -101 -197 0 62.5% +0.89 15–7 (68%) 6–5 (55%) 112.6 +0.69
26 1983 1925 157.4 — — — — +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) 101.6 -3.38 1978 1956 150.8 — — — — +44 -254 -114 58.9% +0.42 9–5 (64%) 15–10 (60%) 108.5 -1.31
27 1984 1830 139.9 — — — — -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) 95.8 +0.20 1979 1983 152.5 — — — — +53 -246 -92 58.0% +0.51 14–2 (88%) 12–6 (67%) 111.6 -2.02
28 1985 1669 116.8 — — — — +90 — +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 97.1 +0.21 1980 1880 148.3 — — — — +25 — +22 56.7% +0.43 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 94.1 -3.86
29 1986 1657 124.4 — — — — +15 — +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 96.1 +2.27 1981 1868 150.9 — — — — +30 -139 -33 55.2% +0.51 9–6 (60%) 9–12 (43%) 98.3 -4.50
30 1987 1562 119.1 — — — — +53 — +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) 98.2 +2.59 1982 1729 145.3 — — — — +53 — +39 41.8% -0.47 7–8 (47%) 7–14 (33%) 92.5 -3.75
31 1988 1535 117.2 — — — — +7 — +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 -0.45 1983 1759 134.2 — — — — +16 -67 +54 54.9% +0.15 6–8 (43%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +0.12
32 1989 1600 129.3 — — — — +18 — — 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -1.52 1984 1613 132.9 — — — — +12 +73 +194 41.2% -0.58 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 97.8 -1.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1585 121.6 — — — — +9 — +164 43.5% -0.26 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.1 +0.41
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1583 108.2 — — — — -10 — — 22.2% -1.89 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.44
Career — 2018 148.5 — — — — +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67 — 2013 149.8 — — — — +23 -151 +14 53.2% +0.20 79–65 (55%) 83–78 (52%) 102.3 -3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.