H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Tom Gorman H2H: 1-2
Tom Gorman holds a 2–1 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tom Gorman leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1979 Maui semifinal 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1979* | Maui | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-0 6-2 | Tom Gorman | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1979* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tom Gorman | 4-6 7-6 7-5 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1977* | La Costa | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tom Gorman | 6-4 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Tom Gorman | #826 | #10 | 0 | 2,006 | 418 | 293 | 58.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Tom Gorman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 19–13 | 59.4% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 49–31 | 61.2% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 44–27 | 62.0% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 44–28 | 61.1% | — | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 52–28 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,942 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 53–26 | 67.1% | #21 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #46 | 1,747 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #53 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #156 | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |