H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Tom Gullikson H2H: 2-2

Bill Scanlon and Tom Gullikson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tom Gullikson leads 2–1 on carpet, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1982 Chicago-2 Wct semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Tom Gullikson
USA Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #68 3-6 6-3 6-2 Tom Gullikson Match data Dec 5, 1982* SF Chicago-2 Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Tom Gullikson 6-2 7-6 Bill Scanlon #26 Match data Feb 25, 1981* R64 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Tom Gullikson 7-6 6-3 Bill Scanlon #30 Match data Nov 1, 1980* SF Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Bill Scanlon #36 6-4 6-1 Tom Gullikson Match data Nov 3, 1977* R32 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Tom Gullikson — — — 1,826 — — — 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Tom Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bill Scanlon Tom Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 7 15 53.3%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1979 7 10 17 41.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 5 11 54.5%
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1981 15 10 25 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4% — 78 81 159 49.1% 20 24 44 45.5% 49 40 89 55.1% 45 59 104 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bill Scanlon Tom Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1976 1654 142.6 — — — — -38 -5 — 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1725 137.5 — — — — +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) — +2.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 1766 135.3 — — — — +66 -179 — 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1838 143.2 — — — — +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1810 150.9 — — — — +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) — -5.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1881 150.7 — — — — +56 — -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.11 1976 1496 107.3 — — — — +59 +42 — 45.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +2.32
25 1982 1850 150.4 — — — — +33 -212 — 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.56 1977 1642 135.7 — — — — +20 -32 -131 44.0% -0.73 4–7 (36%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.47
26 1983 1925 157.4 — — — — +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) — -3.38 1978 1817 146.1 — — — — +23 -219 -132 57.9% +0.54 9–7 (56%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.21
27 1984 1830 139.9 — — — — -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.20 1979 1715 150.4 — — — — +5 -74 -3 45.0% +0.19 3–8 (27%) 4–11 (27%) — -3.00
28 1985 1669 116.8 — — — — +90 — +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.21 1980 1712 135.7 — — — — +29 -86 -79 45.1% -0.35 6–7 (46%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.36
29 1986 1657 124.4 — — — — +15 — +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +2.27 1981 1775 142.4 — — — — +5 — -157 52.7% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.24
30 1987 1562 119.1 — — — — +53 — +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) — +2.59 1982 1779 139.9 — — — — +6 — -161 49.4% +0.04 3–5 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.80
31 1988 1535 117.2 — — — — +7 — +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.45 1983 1730 125.9 — — — — -34 — -16 51.6% +0.21 14–9 (61%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.09
32 1989 1600 129.3 — — — — +18 — — 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -1.52 1984 1700 136.7 — — — — -25 — +44 51.6% +0.22 4–8 (33%) 11–18 (38%) — +0.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1722 129.9 — — — — -60 — +143 49.4% -0.07 10–3 (77%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.17
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1707 122.6 — — — — -53 — +96 36.5% -0.87 4–3 (57%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.61
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1677 99.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 — — +0.07
Career — 2018 148.5 — — — — +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67 — 1826 143.4 — — — — -1 -74 -16 49.1% -0.01 64–66 (49%) 75–98 (43%) 96.9 -1.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.