H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Billy Martin vs Jim Osborne H2H: 0-1

Jim Osborne holds a 1–0 lead over Billy Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1976 San Francisco round of 64 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billy Martin
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Osborne 6-4 3-6 6-4 Billy Martin Match data Sep 29, 1976* R64 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Billy Martin #831 #32 0 1,821 146 175 45.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billy Martin Jim Osborne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 4–7 36.4% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–14 56.2% #36 1,676 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 18–16 52.9% #67 1,714 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1976 29–31 48.3% #62 1,701 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1977 28–29 49.1% #58 1,792 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1978 9–23 28.1% #188 1,665 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1979 14–14 50.0% #66 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1980 15–24 38.5% #118 1,608 0 1 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0
24 1981 10–15 40.0% — 1,577 0 1 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0
25 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,588 0 1 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Billy Martin Jim Osborne
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2 6 8 25.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 12 23 47.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 11 10 21 52.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1982 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 44 78 43.6% 42 52 94 44.7% 20 23 43 46.5% 50 56 106 47.2% — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Billy Martin Jim Osborne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1498 111.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1536 117.4 — — — — +49 — +38 39.3% -0.68 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1677 129.0 — — — — +16 -52 — 53.4% -0.03 4–7 (36%) 10–2 (83%) 104.3 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1714 138.7 — — — — +86 -137 — 51.9% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 10–1 (91%) 106.7 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1702 146.0 — — — — +33 0 -182 49.3% -0.08 6–13 (32%) 5–5 (50%) 96.1 -2.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1793 146.8 — — — — -15 -102 -130 52.2% -0.03 4–12 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 93.1 -2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 1665 137.0 — — — — -32 -6 +57 36.1% -1.01 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 99.3 -2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1680 132.8 — — — — +4 -7 — 51.4% -0.33 3–5 (38%) 7–3 (70%) 103.6 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1609 126.7 — — — — +37 +11 +57 40.2% -0.73 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 99.6 -0.92 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30
24 1981 1577 119.0 — — — — +36 +39 +70 41.9% -0.84 2–3 (40%) 5–2 (71%) 100.5 +1.85 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.41
25 1982 1588 105.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.08 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +2.54
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 101.5 +0.99
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1525 122.7 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) 81.7 +1.15
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
Career — 1821 142.5 — — — — +23 -23 -18 47.0% -0.36 33–61 (35%) 56–26 (68%) 104.7 -1.45 — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.