H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Billy Martin vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 0-1

Nikola Pilic holds a 1–0 lead over Billy Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikola Pilic won the 1974 Hampton quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billy Martin
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Nikola Pilic
CRO Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nikola Pilic #13 6-2 6-3 Billy Martin #141 Match data Mar 15, 1974* QF Hampton ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Billy Martin #831 #32 0 1,821 146 175 45.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nikola Pilic #284 #12 0 1,950 301 249 54.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billy Martin Nikola Pilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 4–7 36.4% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–14 56.2% #36 1,676 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 18–16 52.9% #67 1,714 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1976 29–31 48.3% #62 1,701 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1977 28–29 49.1% #58 1,792 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1978 9–23 28.1% #188 1,665 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1979 14–14 50.0% #66 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1980 15–24 38.5% #118 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1981 10–15 40.0% — 1,577 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,588 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — 1968 42–46 47.7% — 1,636 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1969 27–24 52.9% — 1,767 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1970 47–31 60.3% — 1,887 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1971 39–31 55.7% — 1,842 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1972 34–28 54.8% — 1,891 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1973 44–27 62.0% #15 1,841 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1974 22–12 64.7% #32 1,904 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 1975 20–15 57.1% #50 1,871 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 1976 13–14 48.1% #68 1,752 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 1977 11–14 44.0% #82 1,697 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 1978 2–7 22.2% #284 1,620 0 5

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Billy Martin Nikola Pilic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1498 111.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1536 117.4 — — — — +49 — +38 39.3% -0.68 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1677 129.0 — — — — +16 -52 — 53.4% -0.03 4–7 (36%) 10–2 (83%) 104.3 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1714 138.7 — — — — +86 -137 — 51.9% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 10–1 (91%) 106.7 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1702 146.0 — — — — +33 0 -182 49.3% -0.08 6–13 (32%) 5–5 (50%) 96.1 -2.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1793 146.8 — — — — -15 -102 -130 52.2% -0.03 4–12 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 93.1 -2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 1665 137.0 — — — — -32 -6 +57 36.1% -1.01 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 99.3 -2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1680 132.8 — — — — +4 -7 — 51.4% -0.33 3–5 (38%) 7–3 (70%) 103.6 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1609 126.7 — — — — +37 +11 +57 40.2% -0.73 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 99.6 -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1577 119.0 — — — — +36 +39 +70 41.9% -0.84 2–3 (40%) 5–2 (71%) 100.5 +1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1588 105.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1636 111.3 — — — — -151 -16 -31 47.3% -0.36 10–12 (45%) — — -1.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1768 124.1 — — — — -72 -209 -64 53.7% +0.31 8–9 (47%) 1–0 — -0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1888 148.2 — — — — -193 -47 +36 58.2% +0.88 14–13 (52%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 -3.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1842 144.2 — — — — -19 -83 +111 58.7% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 12–13 (48%) 102.1 -3.55
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1892 147.9 — — — — -16 -78 +47 53.5% +0.29 7–7 (50%) 16–18 (47%) 98.7 -5.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1841 145.7 — — — — -61 +43 +118 60.6% +0.80 10–8 (56%) 15–13 (54%) 98.1 -3.46
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1905 139.1 — — — — -6 — +73 56.0% +0.54 11–3 (79%) 5–8 (38%) 105.7 -1.38
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1872 141.1 — — — — -40 +45 — 57.6% +0.42 7–6 (54%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 -0.41
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1752 126.5 — — — — +23 +27 +201 49.3% -0.20 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 95.7 -0.02
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1698 136.2 — — — — +16 +18 +284 48.4% +0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 96.7 -0.64
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1620 117.9 — — — — — +19 — 34.6% -0.54 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 +0.12
Career — 1821 142.5 — — — — +23 -23 -18 47.0% -0.36 33–61 (35%) 56–26 (68%) 104.7 -1.45 — 1950 142.6 — — — — -68 -21 +43 54.6% +0.39 86–74 (54%) 63–73 (46%) 98.1 -3.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.