H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bjorn Phau vs Amer Delic H2H: 1-0
Bjorn Phau holds a 1–0 lead over Amer Delic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bjorn Phau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bjorn Phau won the 2005 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BIH
Age 44
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Bjorn Phau | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | Amer Delic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bjorn Phau | #1,098 | #59 | 1,038 | 1,733 | 80 | 138 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amer Delic | #1,041 | #60 | 728 | 1,718 | 25 | 53 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bjorn Phau | Amer Delic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #323 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #447 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #148 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #158 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #136 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #93 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #77 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #183 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #219 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #102 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #371 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |