H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bjorn Phau vs Robert Kendrick H2H: 0-2
Robert Kendrick holds a 2–0 lead over Bjorn Phau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robert Kendrick leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robert Kendrick won the 2009 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Robert Kendrick | 7-5 6-2 | Bjorn Phau | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robert Kendrick | 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Bjorn Phau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bjorn Phau | #1,098 | #59 | 1,038 | 1,733 | 80 | 138 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Kendrick | #1,118 | #69 | 968 | 1,729 | 35 | 78 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bjorn Phau | Robert Kendrick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #323 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #148 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #158 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #136 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #77 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #183 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #105 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #102 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #224 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #371 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |