H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bob Carmichael vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 0-2
Ion Tiriac holds a 2–0 lead over Bob Carmichael in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1973 London third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1973* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ion Tiriac | 6-3 6-2 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
| May 4, 1973* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 6-2 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Carmichael | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 27 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |