H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bob Carmichael vs Pat Cramer H2H: 2-1
Bob Carmichael holds a 2–1 lead over Pat Cramer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Bob Carmichael leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bob Carmichael won the 1974 Johannesburg Wct third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1974* | Johannesburg Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bob Carmichael | 6-4 6-3 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1973* | Bretton Woods | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Bob Carmichael | 6-0 6-1 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1970* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pat Cramer | 6-3 6-4 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Carmichael | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |