H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bob Hewitt vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 2-1
Bob Hewitt holds a 2–1 lead over Andres Gimeno in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andres Gimeno won the 1972 Johannesburg quarterfinal 6-3 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1972* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andres Gimeno | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1970* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Bob Hewitt | 7-5 13-11 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1969* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bob Hewitt | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Hewitt | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 28 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |
| 36 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |