H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bob Hewitt vs Fred Stolle H2H: 1-1
Bob Hewitt and Fred Stolle are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay, while Fred Stolle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1975 US Open first round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Bob Hewitt | 6-2 7-6 | Fred Stolle | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1971* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Fred Stolle | 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Fred Stolle | #555 | #30 | 0 | 1,923 | 177 | 168 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Hewitt | Fred Stolle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 28 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 48–31 | 60.8% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 19–23 | 45.2% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 24–26 | 48.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 22–29 | 43.1% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,772 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #305 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,734 | 0 | 6 |
| 40 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 6 |