H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bob Hewitt vs Graham Stilwell H2H: 2-0
Bob Hewitt holds a 2–0 lead over Graham Stilwell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1969 London (4) semifinal 2-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1969* | London (4) | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Bob Hewitt | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Nov 26, 1968* | London 3 | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bob Hewitt | 9-11 6-4 8-6 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Graham Stilwell | #62 | #62 | 0 | 1,734 | 97 | 181 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Hewitt | Graham Stilwell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 15–28 | 34.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–32 | 22.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 10–27 | 27.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 15–33 | 31.2% | #109 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #128 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #83 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |