H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Bob Hewitt vs J Young H2H: 1-0

Bob Hewitt holds a 1–0 lead over J Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1970 Dublin round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bob Hewitt
RSA Age 86 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
J Young
IRL

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bob Hewitt 6-3 6-3 J Young Match data Jul 9, 1970* R32 Dublin ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bob Hewitt #669 #34 0 2,005 285 177 61.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
J Young — — — 1,500 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Bob Hewitt J Young
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 51–15 77.3% — 1,819 0 2 — — — — — — —
1969 31–11 73.8% — 1,859 0 4 — — — — — — —
1970 41–16 71.9% — 1,820 0 5 — — — — — — —
1971 22–10 68.8% — 1,846 0 6 — — — — — — —
1972 52–16 76.5% — 1,908 0 11 — — — — — — —
1973 2–5 28.6% #157 1,891 0 11 — — — — — — —
1974 13–17 43.3% #59 1,728 0 11 — — — — — — —
1975 27–15 64.3% #34 1,847 0 11 — — — — — — —
1976 11–22 33.3% #83 1,667 0 11 — — — — — — —
1977 29–25 53.7% #52 1,722 0 11 — — — — — — —
1978 6–21 22.2% #206 1,596 0 11 — — — — — — —
1979 0–3 0.0% #546 1,547 0 11 — — — — — — —
1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,544 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Bob Hewitt J Young
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 19 6 25 76.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 4 0 4 100.0% 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1969 3 1 4 75.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1970 12 3 15 80.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1971 13 4 17 76.5% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1972 8 4 12 66.7% 24 4 28 85.7% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1974 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 5 4 9 55.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 2 4 6 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 6 5 11 54.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 0 5 5 0.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 74 46 120 61.7% 105 57 162 64.8% 60 31 91 65.9% 46 43 89 51.7% Career — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Bob Hewitt J Young
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1820 126.5 — — — — +136 -148 -56 69.9% +1.44 15–6 (71%) — — +1.26 1970 1498 104.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.28
1969 1859 141.4 — — — — +123 -19 -20 69.7% +1.56 3–4 (43%) — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1970 1820 143.6 — — — — +238 +46 +34 67.5% +1.36 7–7 (50%) — — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1971 1846 128.5 — — — — +173 — -27 66.3% +1.23 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) — +2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1972 1908 140.8 — — — — -33 +104 -12 69.6% +1.43 14–4 (78%) 6–2 (75%) — +2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1973 1891 121.7 — — — — -22 — — 50.0% +0.83 1–0 0–2 — -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1974 1729 124.7 — — — — +61 — +84 45.6% -0.01 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 1848 148.0 — — — — -54 +144 — 62.4% +1.13 6–4 (60%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 1668 136.3 — — — — -1 +183 — 37.9% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 1722 139.7 — — — — +65 +45 -79 53.3% +0.17 9–7 (56%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 1596 127.7 — — — — +107 +31 +90 25.9% -1.72 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -2.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1548 96.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1544 106.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2006 142.5 — — — — +69 +58 -16 60.8% +0.87 68–48 (59%) 26–30 (46%) 97.3 +0.39 Career 1500 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -28.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.