H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bob Hewitt vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 4-1
Bob Hewitt holds a 4–1 lead over Nikola Pilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Bob Hewitt leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1972 Los Angeles Wct third round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1972* | Los Angeles Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bob Hewitt | 7-6 6-0 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1971* | London | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-3 7-6 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1970* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Bob Hewitt | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| May 1, 1970* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Bob Hewitt | 6-3 7-5 1-6 6-3 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1969* | Dublin | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Bob Hewitt | 6-3 6-2 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Hewitt | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 28 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |