H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bob Hewitt vs Rod Laver H2H: 0-3
Rod Laver holds a 3–0 lead over Bob Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1971 Wembley semifinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1971* | Wembley | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Rod Laver | (w/o) | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1970* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-4 8-6 6-1 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1969* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Hewitt | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 28 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |