H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-1
Bohdan Ulihrach and David Prinosil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2002 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1997* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-1 6-1 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bohdan Ulihrach | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |