H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Bohdan Ulihrach vs Doug Flach H2H: 1-0

Bohdan Ulihrach holds a 1–0 lead over Doug Flach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 1997 Indianapolis round of 64 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bohdan Ulihrach
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Doug Flach
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bohdan Ulihrach #32 6-4 7-5 Doug Flach #148 Match data Aug 13, 1997* R64 Indianapolis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bohdan Ulihrach #805 #22 1,399 1,840 218 236 48.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Doug Flach #788 #108 415 1,628 28 46 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bohdan Ulihrach Doug Flach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #577 1,517 0 0
18 1993 0–1 0.0% #472 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #142 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 29–20 59.2% #28 1,715 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1996 34–31 52.3% #41 1,767 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1997 26–27 49.1% #34 1,770 0 2 1993 6–8 42.9% #123 1,569 0 0
23 1998 31–28 52.5% #33 1,757 0 3 1994 4–17 19.0% #215 1,473 0 0
24 1999 12–22 35.3% #107 1,650 0 3 1995 0–1 0.0% #648 1,462 0 0
25 2000 15–17 46.9% #76 1,664 0 3 1996 3–2 60.0% #146 1,539 0 0
26 2001 34–26 56.7% #32 1,774 0 3 1997 11–14 44.0% #174 1,572 0 0
27 2002 21–27 43.8% #75 1,683 0 3 1998 3–3 50.0% #215 1,609 0 0
28 2003 3–6 33.3% #246 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2004 11–19 36.7% #86 1,608 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2005 1–8 11.1% #285 1,561 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2006 0–1 0.0% #349 1,558 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2007 1–2 33.3% #164 1,596 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bohdan Ulihrach Doug Flach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 27 17 44 61.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 9 8 17 52.9% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1993 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1994 3 8 11 27.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2001 19 13 32 59.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 79 84 163 48.5% 110 102 212 51.9% 5 14 19 26.3% 24 36 60 40.0% — 16 25 41 39.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 409/454 of Bohdan Ulihrach's and 65/72 of Doug Flach's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bohdan Ulihrach Doug Flach
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1993 1/1 1.0 6.0 41.9% 65.4% 38.9% 16.7% 33.3% 50.0% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1/1 1.0 0.0 42.6% 25.0% 63.0% 33.3% 50.0% 46.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 43/49 2.7 3.6 52.7% 67.2% 47.9% 59.0% 49.2% 58.1% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 58/65 3.4 3.7 56.1% 69.1% 48.4% 54.7% 44.1% 60.0% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 48/53 3.3 3.6 54.8% 71.2% 51.6% 57.3% 50.1% 62.5% 38.6% 1993 13/14 3.5 3.1 56.1% 68.3% 47.6% 46.4% 43.7% 59.0% 37.9%
23 1998 53/59 3.1 3.6 58.0% 68.4% 49.0% 55.0% 43.5% 60.1% 40.8% 1994 19/21 2.5 3.5 58.4% 63.4% 45.0% 59.5% 34.9% 55.7% 34.3%
24 1999 29/34 4.0 4.6 58.3% 68.5% 49.9% 57.9% 34.3% 60.5% 37.0% 1995 1/1 3.0 6.0 61.9% 65.0% 35.1% 62.5% 20.0% 53.6% 34.3%
25 2000 31/32 2.7 4.0 58.5% 64.7% 46.7% 59.1% 42.1% 56.9% 40.6% 1996 2/5 12.0 6.0 58.7% 67.1% 45.6% 43.2% 30.5% 58.4% 38.2%
26 2001 53/60 3.1 3.5 57.8% 69.5% 49.5% 53.9% 43.5% 60.9% 39.7% 1997 24/25 3.1 4.0 56.6% 65.8% 46.4% 52.8% 45.5% 57.4% 38.8%
27 2002 40/48 3.5 3.1 64.0% 66.1% 49.7% 60.5% 39.8% 60.0% 36.8% 1998 6/6 1.0 2.3 58.1% 60.6% 48.3% 41.0% 57.5% 55.2% 39.8%
28 2003 9/9 3.2 2.6 64.4% 67.0% 50.0% 64.0% 30.6% 60.9% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 30/30 3.1 4.0 57.4% 69.4% 48.3% 54.7% 37.4% 60.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 9/9 1.8 3.2 65.5% 59.8% 46.0% 57.1% 27.6% 55.6% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.9% 52.6% 40.0% 45.5% 28.6% 47.1% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 3/3 12.7 8.7 60.2% 72.1% 50.5% 59.4% 22.8% 63.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 409/454 3.2 3.7 57.6% 68.1% 49.0% 56.7% 42.6% 59.9% 39.1% — 65/74 3.1 3.6 57.3% 65.2% 46.2% 52.2% 42.3% 57.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bohdan Ulihrach Doug Flach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1517 110.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 — — +0.02
18 1993 1492 103.0 -0.80 -2.87 0.604 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1475 96.1 -0.13 -1.57 0.627 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1715 141.9 -2.10 +3.88 1.052 50.9% -145 +66 — 58.7% +0.45 9–9 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1768 146.5 -0.84 +2.63 1.024 50.5% -108 +57 -149 50.6% +0.01 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 1770 148.6 +0.96 +1.58 1.028 50.5% +3 -23 — 52.8% +0.24 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — -2.52 1993 1569 129.0 -1.64 +0.52 0.925 48.4% +24 — — 42.9% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.16
23 1998 1757 145.7 -0.99 +2.84 1.022 50.3% -27 +71 — 52.0% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.52 1994 1473 119.8 -4.15 -1.48 0.776 45.4% +91 +7 +73 25.0% -1.71 0–4 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.42
24 1999 1651 135.6 -1.17 -0.40 0.936 48.8% +16 +125 — 40.6% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.70 1995 1462 99.6 -2.17 -0.92 0.740 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
25 2000 1665 136.1 -4.20 +2.29 0.943 48.8% -33 +149 — 47.3% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.94 1996 1540 108.3 +1.07 +1.46 0.919 48.0% — — +74 50.0% -0.83 — 4–0 (100%) — +0.18
26 2001 1774 146.7 -0.26 +2.07 1.016 50.3% +3 +61 — 53.1% +0.08 14–7 (67%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.57 1997 1573 119.7 -3.04 +0.18 0.912 48.2% +20 -88 +66 46.9% -0.72 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.00
27 2002 1683 138.8 -1.87 +0.24 0.921 48.5% -8 +77 -217 45.5% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 6–9 (40%) — -2.48 1998 1610 108.9 -2.52 +0.84 0.890 47.6% — — +73 42.9% -0.29 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.45
28 2003 1629 108.5 -1.16 -2.85 0.867 47.3% +17 — — 31.8% -1.05 1–0 0–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1609 123.8 -2.09 -1.61 0.874 47.8% +63 -9 — 38.5% -0.72 1–6 (14%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1561 117.4 -3.44 -1.79 0.637 42.8% +81 +5 — 15.0% -2.05 — 0–2 — -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1558 99.4 +0.19 -2.67 0.845 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1597 106.2 +0.35 -3.60 0.896 48.4% — — — 38.5% -0.15 1–1 0–2 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1587 107.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1840 145.5 -1.23 +1.51 0.976 49.5% -12 +69 -188 48.5% -0.13 63–71 (47%) 58–74 (44%) 95.0 -2.55 — 1629 125.3 -2.90 -0.15 0.868 47.3% +43 -29 +71 40.1% -0.86 8–13 (38%) 20–13 (61%) 102.9 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.