H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2002 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 7-5 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Bohdan Ulihrach | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |