H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 0-2
Jan Siemerink holds a 2–0 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1998 London fourth round 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1998* | London | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1995* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bohdan Ulihrach | Jan Siemerink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 |