H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 1-0
Bohdan Ulihrach holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 2000 Umag third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2000* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-4 7-5 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bohdan Ulihrach | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |