H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Boris Becker vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 9-0

Boris Becker holds a 9–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 6–0 on clay and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Boris Becker won the 1999 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 5-7 6-4.

GER Age 58 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
9 0
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Boris Becker #60 6-4 5-7 6-4 Cedric Pioline #22 Match data
Jul 23, 1998* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Boris Becker #81 7-6(5) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data
Jul 10, 1998* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Boris Becker #119 7-6(2) 7-5 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data
May 15, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Boris Becker #13 6-4 7-5 Cedric Pioline #33 Match data
Dec 9, 1995* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Boris Becker #4 6-1 6-7 9-7 Cedric Pioline #55 Match data
Jul 7, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Boris Becker #4 6-3 6-1 6-7(6) 6-7(10) 9-7 Cedric Pioline #58 Match data
May 14, 1994* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Boris Becker #13 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #14 Match data
Feb 12, 1994* Milan ATP 250 QF Carpet Boris Becker #13 6-2 4-6 6-2 Cedric Pioline #12 Match data
Apr 26, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Boris Becker #3 7-5 6-4 Cedric Pioline #167 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Boris Becker #257 #1 4,297 2,266 670 219 75.4% 6 9 4 0 30 49
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Boris Becker Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
16 1984 11–11 50.0% #66 1,651 0 0
17 1985 50–18 73.5% #6 2,066 1 3
18 1986 65–13 83.3% #2 2,229 2 9
19 1987 50–15 76.9% #5 2,040 2 12
20 1988 50–9 84.7% #4 2,180 2 19 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1989 54–8 87.1% #2 2,232 4 24 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1990 69–14 83.1% #2 2,206 4 29 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1991 46–13 78.0% #3 2,112 5 31 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1992 48–15 76.2% #5 2,145 5 36 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1993 42–22 65.6% #11 1,885 5 38 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1994 50–17 74.6% #3 2,052 5 42 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1995 51–18 73.9% #4 2,043 5 44 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1996 42–14 75.0% #6 2,083 6 49 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1997 17–13 56.7% #62 1,914 6 49 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1998 15–11 57.7% #69 1,874 6 49 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1999 10–7 58.8% #131 1,863 6 49 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5