H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Boris Becker vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 2-0
Boris Becker holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Boris Becker won the 1996 Wimbledon second round 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Boris Becker | 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Boris Becker | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris Becker | #257 | #1 | 4,297 | 2,266 | 670 | 219 | 75.4% | 6 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 49 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Boris Becker | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #6 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 65–13 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,229 | 2 | 9 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,040 | 2 | 12 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 50–9 | 84.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 2 | 19 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 54–8 | 87.1% | #2 | 2,232 | 4 | 24 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 69–14 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,206 | 4 | 29 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,112 | 5 | 31 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,145 | 5 | 36 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,885 | 5 | 38 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #3 | 2,052 | 5 | 42 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #4 | 2,043 | 5 | 44 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,083 | 6 | 49 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1997 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #62 | 1,914 | 6 | 49 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #69 | 1,874 | 6 | 49 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #131 | 1,863 | 6 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |