H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Borna Coric vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-1

Borna Coric and Denis Istomin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2016 Miami Open first round 4-6 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Coric
Croatia Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denis Istomin #76 4-6 7-5 7-5 Borna Coric #46 Match data Mar 25, 2016* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Borna Coric #85 6-4 7-5 Denis Istomin #65 Match data Feb 19, 2015* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Borna Coric #237 #12 2,695 2,048 200 188 51.5% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,914 196 249 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Coric Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2013 0–1 0.0% #303 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2014 6–5 54.5% #102 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 24–27 47.1% #44 1,824 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2016 21–21 50.0% #48 1,849 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2017 21–25 45.7% #48 1,801 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2018 35–19 64.8% #12 2,014 0 2 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2019 27–22 55.1% #28 1,833 0 2 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,635 0 0
23 2020 15–10 60.0% #24 1,889 0 2 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2021 6–3 66.7% #73 1,896 0 2 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2022 16–12 57.1% #26 1,934 0 3 2012 28–30 48.3% #43 1,751 0 0
26 2023 18–18 50.0% #37 1,789 0 3 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,811 0 0
27 2024 11–18 37.9% #90 1,651 0 3 2014 27–24 52.9% #49 1,860 0 0
28 2025 0–7 0.0% #115 1,575 0 3 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,789 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2016 6–20 23.1% #121 1,707 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,723 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,678 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,575 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,552 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–3 0.0% #254 1,537 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Borna Coric Denis Istomin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 12 17 29 41.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2017 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2018 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2008 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2020 11 6 17 64.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 17 19 36 47.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
24 2021 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 10 17 41.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2022 13 7 20 65.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
26 2023 9 10 19 47.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 25 19 44 56.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2024 8 12 20 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 13 17 30 43.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
28 2025 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 10 11 9.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 8 13 38.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 121 249 51.4% 60 53 113 53.1% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — 119 148 267 44.6% 40 67 107 37.4% 37 33 70 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/388 of Borna Coric's and 437/445 of Denis Istomin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Borna Coric Denis Istomin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.9% 66.1% 35.9% 45.5% 40.0% 53.7% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 11/11 7.5 2.7 57.7% 74.3% 56.6% 63.7% 48.8% 66.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 51/51 3.6 2.3 59.2% 69.9% 49.5% 56.5% 43.6% 61.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 40/42 6.2 2.1 62.4% 70.2% 53.3% 57.8% 36.1% 64.0% 35.1% 2006 2/2 7.5 2.0 61.5% 66.3% 47.4% 60.2% 22.2% 59.1% 27.3%
20 2017 46/46 6.1 2.6 62.6% 71.6% 53.5% 64.9% 36.5% 64.7% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2018 54/54 5.9 1.9 63.9% 73.7% 56.7% 62.2% 47.5% 67.4% 38.2% 2008 4/4 4.5 2.0 62.2% 68.4% 49.7% 65.1% 38.0% 61.3% 35.4%
22 2019 48/49 7.4 2.5 62.7% 73.3% 53.8% 63.4% 45.3% 66.1% 35.2% 2009 29/30 6.6 2.7 66.1% 69.8% 48.8% 54.8% 41.5% 62.4% 34.1%
23 2020 25/25 6.8 2.0 64.1% 73.3% 53.3% 59.9% 47.7% 66.0% 37.5% 2010 58/58 6.7 1.5 65.3% 70.2% 53.9% 54.2% 41.5% 64.5% 36.2%
24 2021 9/9 9.1 2.0 66.5% 75.7% 59.2% 62.4% 33.2% 70.0% 35.2% 2011 31/31 5.5 2.2 64.3% 64.3% 49.6% 56.0% 36.7% 59.3% 34.6%
25 2022 28/28 6.8 1.8 61.8% 74.4% 53.3% 58.6% 38.2% 66.5% 34.3% 2012 54/58 7.1 1.7 63.9% 70.8% 52.2% 58.0% 39.1% 64.1% 35.8%
26 2023 36/36 4.7 2.1 59.8% 73.2% 50.5% 58.9% 39.0% 64.1% 33.9% 2013 59/59 6.3 2.0 63.2% 72.0% 51.6% 64.5% 39.1% 64.4% 35.1%
27 2024 29/29 7.0 2.3 61.0% 72.5% 51.9% 58.9% 37.6% 63.9% 35.8% 2014 50/51 7.0 1.6 67.9% 72.2% 50.5% 58.6% 39.9% 65.0% 34.8%
28 2025 7/7 5.0 3.7 58.1% 69.9% 47.7% 52.7% 40.7% 61.0% 28.4% 2015 43/43 5.7 1.3 63.5% 72.5% 51.8% 58.3% 38.9% 64.8% 36.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 25/26 6.8 2.1 63.5% 69.9% 49.2% 52.9% 44.8% 62.3% 33.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/33 8.4 1.7 65.4% 72.3% 50.1% 59.7% 44.3% 64.7% 34.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 30/30 5.7 1.5 68.7% 71.0% 51.0% 56.5% 34.9% 64.5% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 14/14 5.5 2.0 65.7% 72.4% 49.2% 56.9% 39.4% 64.5% 30.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 64.0% 65.6% 27.8% 60.0% 0.0% 52.0% 28.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/3 2.0 2.5 72.1% 64.6% 44.2% 50.8% — 59.2% 19.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 3.5 1.5 68.0% 69.9% 41.1% 72.2% 21.4% 60.5% 33.4%
Career — 385/388 6.0 2.3 61.9% 72.4% 53.1% 60.3% 41.6% 65.0% 35.4% — 437/445 6.5 1.8 65.1% 70.7% 51.0% 57.9% 39.5% 63.8% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Borna Coric Denis Istomin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2013 1496 104.8 -5.62 -1.81 0.685 43.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1647 135.5 +1.21 +0.82 1.117 52.1% +22 -71 — 62.1% +0.72 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1825 148.4 -1.60 -0.26 0.897 48.1% -59 -72 -214 45.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 9–4 (69%) — -2.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1850 153.7 +0.55 -0.45 0.974 49.2% -25 -61 — 48.0% -0.13 9–5 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.13 2006 1474 112.2 +1.83 +2.43 0.669 43.4% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.22
20 2017 1801 150.5 +1.10 -0.60 0.987 50.0% -14 0 — 48.3% +0.03 6–10 (38%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.65 2007 1486 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2018 2015 171.3 +3.58 +2.92 1.171 52.4% -6 -182 -326 60.5% +0.93 10–7 (59%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63 2008 1559 115.8 -0.37 +0.78 0.914 48.9% +45 — — 50.0% -0.08 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.02
22 2019 1834 148.1 +1.54 -0.54 1.038 50.4% +34 +2 -98 53.5% +0.21 16–9 (64%) 14–13 (52%) — +2.58 2009 1636 125.3 -1.33 -1.62 0.907 48.6% +16 -133 -53 42.9% -0.57 5–2 (71%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.12
23 2020 1890 151.6 +2.06 +1.63 1.100 51.8% +45 -107 — 54.7% +0.47 4–1 (80%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.30 2010 1768 143.4 +1.15 +0.13 1.018 50.4% -22 -228 -27 51.7% +0.19 13–12 (52%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.33
24 2021 1897 136.0 +3.17 -1.19 1.175 52.0% +41 — — 66.7% +0.52 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.32 2011 1666 130.3 -2.79 -1.92 0.850 47.1% +33 -165 +77 37.3% -0.88 1–5 (17%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.16
25 2022 1934 157.0 +2.43 -0.11 1.026 50.3% +53 -155 — 55.6% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 10–3 (77%) — -0.53 2012 1751 150.1 +1.09 -0.48 0.999 50.0% -33 -229 +124 48.6% +0.04 10–10 (50%) 14–14 (50%) — -1.49
26 2023 1789 143.1 +0.08 -1.32 0.943 49.0% +50 +85 -136 46.7% -0.26 6–5 (55%) 10–7 (59%) — +2.50 2013 1812 153.1 +0.94 -0.48 0.987 49.9% +15 -243 -31 50.0% +0.05 10–10 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.77
27 2024 1651 134.1 -0.08 -0.34 0.992 50.1% +41 +115 — 40.0% -0.36 2–6 (25%) 4–12 (25%) — +0.58 2014 1860 158.1 +1.45 -0.54 0.996 50.0% +1 -139 -14 52.7% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 13–14 (48%) — -3.30
28 2025 1575 109.9 -1.95 -2.84 0.729 45.3% +14 — — 15.8% -1.79 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 2015 1790 143.8 +0.64 +0.10 1.036 50.5% -25 -86 +93 48.4% +0.09 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.14
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1707 140.8 -0.07 -2.12 0.894 48.4% -28 -26 +126 33.8% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1723 138.9 +1.33 -1.58 0.968 49.5% +6 -29 -40 45.2% -0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1679 132.6 +0.11 -1.51 0.968 49.0% -23 +18 +38 45.8% -0.11 4–6 (40%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1576 124.0 -0.42 -1.96 0.862 47.8% +79 +78 — 25.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.40
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1552 113.0 -1.58 +7.36 0.589 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1538 107.3 -0.95 -2.93 0.484 41.2% — — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1571 110.4 -1.64 -0.13 0.846 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.06
Career — 2048 158.1 +1.04 +0.08 1.010 50.1% +9 -38 -201 50.5% +0.04 69–62 (53%) 92–86 (52%) 100.7 +0.55 — 1914 147.1 +0.44 -0.79 0.963 49.4% -2 -119 +38 46.1% -0.19 63–74 (46%) 107–108 (50%) 101.5 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.