H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Borna Coric vs Di Wu H2H: 1-0
Borna Coric holds a 1–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2019 Zhuhai fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019* | Zhuhai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-3 6-3 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Borna Coric | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |