H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Donald Young H2H: 3-0
Borna Coric holds a 3–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Borna Coric leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2018 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-0 6-2 | Donald Young | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2017* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Borna Coric | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Donald Young | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2015* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Borna Coric | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Donald Young | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |