H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0
Borna Coric holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2016 Canada Masters second round 5-7 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Borna Coric | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |