H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Juan Ignacio Londero H2H: 2-0
Borna Coric holds a 2–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Londero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2020 US Open second round 7-5 4-6 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Borna Coric | 7-5 4-6 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2020* | ATP Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Borna Coric | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Juan Ignacio Londero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |