H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Borna Coric vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 1-1
Borna Coric and Juan Martin del Potro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2018 Shanghai Masters fourth round 7-5 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Borna Coric | 7-5 0-0 (ret.) | Juan Martin del Potro | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-4 6-3 6-1 | Borna Coric | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Juan Martin del Potro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 |