H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Borna Coric vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 1-1

Borna Coric and Richard Gasquet are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on clay, while Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2024 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 7-6(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Coric
Croatia Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #124 7-6(5) 7-6(2) 6-4 Borna Coric #73 Match data May 28, 2024* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Borna Coric #50 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #37 Match data Feb 28, 2018* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Borna Coric #237 #12 2,695 2,048 200 188 51.5% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Coric Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2013 0–1 0.0% #303 1,495 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2014 6–5 54.5% #102 1,646 0 0 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2015 24–27 47.1% #44 1,824 0 0 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2016 21–21 50.0% #48 1,849 0 0 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2017 21–25 45.7% #48 1,801 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2018 35–19 64.8% #12 2,014 0 2 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2019 27–22 55.1% #28 1,833 0 2 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2020 15–10 60.0% #24 1,889 0 2 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2021 6–3 66.7% #73 1,896 0 2 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2022 16–12 57.1% #26 1,934 0 3 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2023 18–18 50.0% #37 1,789 0 3 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2024 11–18 37.9% #90 1,651 0 3 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2025 0–7 0.0% #115 1,575 0 3 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 — — — — — — — 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 — — — — — — — 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Borna Coric Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2015 12 17 29 41.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2017 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2018 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2020 11 6 17 64.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2021 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2022 13 7 20 65.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2023 9 10 19 47.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2024 8 12 20 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2025 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 121 249 51.4% 60 53 113 53.1% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/388 of Borna Coric's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Borna Coric Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.9% 66.1% 35.9% 45.5% 40.0% 53.7% 31.7% 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 2014 11/11 7.5 2.7 57.7% 74.3% 56.6% 63.7% 48.8% 66.3% 37.6% 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 2015 51/51 3.6 2.3 59.2% 69.9% 49.5% 56.5% 43.6% 61.7% 34.4% 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 2016 40/42 6.2 2.1 62.4% 70.2% 53.3% 57.8% 36.1% 64.0% 35.1% 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2017 46/46 6.1 2.6 62.6% 71.6% 53.5% 64.9% 36.5% 64.7% 34.8% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2018 54/54 5.9 1.9 63.9% 73.7% 56.7% 62.2% 47.5% 67.4% 38.2% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2019 48/49 7.4 2.5 62.7% 73.3% 53.8% 63.4% 45.3% 66.1% 35.2% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2020 25/25 6.8 2.0 64.1% 73.3% 53.3% 59.9% 47.7% 66.0% 37.5% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2021 9/9 9.1 2.0 66.5% 75.7% 59.2% 62.4% 33.2% 70.0% 35.2% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2022 28/28 6.8 1.8 61.8% 74.4% 53.3% 58.6% 38.2% 66.5% 34.3% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2023 36/36 4.7 2.1 59.8% 73.2% 50.5% 58.9% 39.0% 64.1% 33.9% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2024 29/29 7.0 2.3 61.0% 72.5% 51.9% 58.9% 37.6% 63.9% 35.8% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2025 7/7 5.0 3.7 58.1% 69.9% 47.7% 52.7% 40.7% 61.0% 28.4% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 385/388 6.0 2.3 61.9% 72.4% 53.1% 60.3% 41.6% 65.0% 35.4% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Borna Coric Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2013 1496 104.8 -5.62 -1.81 0.685 43.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 2014 1647 135.5 +1.21 +0.82 1.117 52.1% +22 -71 — 62.1% +0.72 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.07 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 2015 1825 148.4 -1.60 -0.26 0.897 48.1% -59 -72 -214 45.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 9–4 (69%) — -2.71 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35
19 2016 1850 153.7 +0.55 -0.45 0.974 49.2% -25 -61 — 48.0% -0.13 9–5 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.13 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52
20 2017 1801 150.5 +1.10 -0.60 0.987 50.0% -14 0 — 48.3% +0.03 6–10 (38%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.65 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51
21 2018 2015 171.3 +3.58 +2.92 1.171 52.4% -6 -182 -326 60.5% +0.93 10–7 (59%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61
22 2019 1834 148.1 +1.54 -0.54 1.038 50.4% +34 +2 -98 53.5% +0.21 16–9 (64%) 14–13 (52%) — +2.58 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90
23 2020 1890 151.6 +2.06 +1.63 1.100 51.8% +45 -107 — 54.7% +0.47 4–1 (80%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.30 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85
24 2021 1897 136.0 +3.17 -1.19 1.175 52.0% +41 — — 66.7% +0.52 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.32 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00
25 2022 1934 157.0 +2.43 -0.11 1.026 50.3% +53 -155 — 55.6% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 10–3 (77%) — -0.53 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44
26 2023 1789 143.1 +0.08 -1.32 0.943 49.0% +50 +85 -136 46.7% -0.26 6–5 (55%) 10–7 (59%) — +2.50 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77
27 2024 1651 134.1 -0.08 -0.34 0.992 50.1% +41 +115 — 40.0% -0.36 2–6 (25%) 4–12 (25%) — +0.58 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10
28 2025 1575 109.9 -1.95 -2.84 0.729 45.3% +14 — — 15.8% -1.79 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 2048 158.1 +1.04 +0.08 1.010 50.1% +9 -38 -201 50.5% +0.04 69–62 (53%) 92–86 (52%) 100.7 +0.55 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.