H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Borna Coric vs Roger Federer H2H: 2-4

Roger Federer holds a 4–2 lead over Borna Coric in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2019 Rome Masters fourth round 2-6 6-4 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Coric
Croatia Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2019* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Roger Federer #3 2-6 6-4 7-6(7) Borna Coric #15 Match data
Mar 2, 2019* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Roger Federer #7 6-2 6-2 Borna Coric #13 Match data
Oct 13, 2018* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Borna Coric #19 6-4 6-4 Roger Federer #2 Match data
Jun 24, 2018* Halle ATP 500 F Grass Borna Coric #34 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 Roger Federer #1 Match data
Mar 17, 2018* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Roger Federer #1 5-7 6-4 6-4 Borna Coric #49 Match data
Feb 28, 2015* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Roger Federer #2 6-2 6-1 Borna Coric #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Borna Coric #237 #12 2,695 2,047 200 187 51.7% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Coric Roger Federer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2013 0–1 0.0% #303 1,495 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0
17 2014 6–5 54.5% #102 1,647 0 0 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0
18 2015 24–27 47.1% #44 1,824 0 0 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0
19 2016 21–20 51.2% #48 1,866 0 0 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1
20 2017 21–25 45.7% #48 1,803 0 1 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4
21 2018 35–19 64.8% #12 2,014 0 2 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11
22 2019 27–22 55.1% #28 1,814 0 2 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22
23 2020 15–10 60.0% #24 1,883 0 2 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33
24 2021 6–3 66.7% #73 1,891 0 2 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45
25 2022 16–12 57.1% #26 1,931 0 3 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53
26 2023 18–18 50.0% #37 1,789 0 3 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57
27 2024 11–18 37.9% #90 1,650 0 3 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61
28 2025 0–7 0.0% #115 1,574 0 3 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66
29 — — — — — — — 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70
30 — — — — — — — 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76
31 — — — — — — — 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77
32 — — — — — — — 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82
33 — — — — — — — 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88
34 — — — — — — — 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88
35 — — — — — — — 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95
36 — — — — — — — 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99
37 — — — — — — — 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103
38 — — — — — — — 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103