H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-1
Borna Coric holds a 2–1 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 1-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Borna Coric | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 1-6 9-7 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2015* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Borna Coric | 6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2015* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-2 6-4 | Borna Coric | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Borna Coric | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |