H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 1-0
Borna Coric holds a 1–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2016 Marrakech fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2016* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Borna Coric | (w/o) | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Simone Bolelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |