H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 13:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Borna Coric H2H: 0-1
Borna Coric holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2021 Rotterdam third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2021* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-4 7-6(4) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Borna Coric | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |