H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC
Clement Chidekh holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Clement Chidekh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Clement Chidekh won the 2026 European Open first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clement Chidekh | 6-1 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Oct 20, 2026 | R32 | European Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #38 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 127 | 127 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clement Chidekh | #152 | #146 | 387 | 1,557 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Clement Chidekh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 1–0 | 100.0% | #152 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Clement Chidekh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2026 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 83 | 81 | 164 | 50.6% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 253/255 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 3/4 of Clement Chidekh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Clement Chidekh | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 66.0% | 69.1% | 62.9% | 84.6% | 50.0% | 67.0% | 35.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 55.0% | 73.0% | 44.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 60.0% | 29.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% | 2026 | 1/2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 77.0% | 68.0% | 55.0% | 33.0% | 40.0% | 65.0% | 56.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 51/52 | 7.2 | 4.9 | 61.8% | 72.9% | 45.3% | 64.5% | 45.7% | 62.5% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 253/255 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.7% | 47.0% | 59.8% | 41.1% | 62.3% | 37.8% | — | 3/4 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 66.0% | 70.0% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 46.7% | 64.0% | 40.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Clement Chidekh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1514 | 108.4 | -2.65 | +3.90 | 1.078 | 51.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1490 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1524 | 109.1 | +0.33 | -1.20 | 0.725 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | 108.1 | -0.41 | 2026 | 1557 | 112.3 | +1.53 | -0.58 | 1.600 | 59.0% | — | — | — | 100.0% | +3.50 | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | 107.5 | -1.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.7 | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.0 | -2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.4 | -1.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1837 | 148.2 | -1.36 | +2.49 | 1.020 | 50.6% | +22 | -131 | -197 | 55.1% | +0.19 | 7–10 (41%) | 21–11 (66%) | 103.6 | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1933 | 149.0 | -1.00 | +1.98 | 1.001 | 50.0% | +6 | -61 | -100 | 49.1% | -0.07 | 41–40 (51%) | 67–54 (55%) | 106.5 | -2.37 | — | 1557 | 110.8 | -0.26 | +0.71 | 1.116 | 51.4% | — | — | — | 42.9% | +0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | -6.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 1 | 0 | 1 | Oct 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Zizou Bergs | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Quentin Halys | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 9, 2023 | H2H |