H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Daniel Evans H2H: 0-1

Daniel Evans holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Evans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2023 US Open second round 1-6 6-1 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Botic van de Zandschulp
Netherlands Age 30 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Evans
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Evans #28 1-6 6-1 6-3 6-3 Botic van de Zandschulp #65 Match data Aug 31, 2023* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Botic van de Zandschulp #70 #22 1,573 1,933 120 122 49.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Evans #385 #21 2,195 1,926 141 161 46.7% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Daniel Evans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #477 1,465 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #261 1,442 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #363 1,504 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #342 1,489 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #297 1,533 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #150 1,692 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2014 4–6 40.0% #305 1,679 0 0
25 2021 15–10 60.0% #57 1,854 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2022 34–28 54.8% #35 1,836 0 0 2016 9–8 52.9% #66 1,791 0 0
27 2023 20–24 45.5% #50 1,792 0 0 2017 11–10 52.4% #133 1,820 0 0
28 2024 14–22 38.9% #80 1,778 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #192 1,787 0 0
29 2025 16–20 44.4% #77 1,715 0 0 2019 18–18 50.0% #42 1,815 0 0
30 2026 21–18 53.8% #70 1,767 0 0 2020 16–13 55.2% #32 1,857 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 23–22 51.1% #25 1,836 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 27–26 50.9% #27 1,848 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2023 15–23 39.5% #38 1,761 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2024 7–20 25.9% #164 1,707 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2025 7–6 53.8% #185 1,725 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Daniel Evans
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2021 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2022 18 17 35 51.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
27 2023 15 15 30 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2025 10 13 23 43.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2026 12 9 21 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 16 10 26 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 22 16 38 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 6 11 17 35.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
Career — 76 76 152 50.0% 32 32 64 50.0% 12 14 26 46.2% — 102 97 199 51.3% 18 36 54 33.3% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 297/302 of Daniel Evans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Daniel Evans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.2% 48.3% 35.0% 28.6% — 42.9% 15.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 3.0 5.0 66.3% 53.8% 30.3% 46.7% 100.0% 45.9% 29.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 3.0 52.2% 60.0% 56.3% 20.0% 36.4% 58.2% 44.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 7.5 10.0 63.8% 74.1% 53.8% 57.1% 52.4% 66.7% 33.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.0% 58.3% 59.4% 69.2% 75.0% 58.8% 42.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 7.2 4.7 60.9% 67.8% 50.3% 65.8% 44.6% 61.3% 40.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 10/10 7.5 3.3 58.8% 71.6% 51.0% 55.6% 34.0% 63.1% 33.8%
25 2021 25/25 7.0 4.4 62.4% 75.0% 49.1% 62.9% 32.0% 65.1% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2022 62/62 6.5 3.9 63.4% 71.7% 49.1% 59.5% 43.9% 63.1% 38.8% 2016 17/17 5.6 4.8 59.5% 70.2% 53.5% 63.1% 40.0% 63.5% 36.2%
27 2023 44/44 5.7 3.6 62.8% 69.5% 47.5% 58.2% 36.3% 61.1% 38.0% 2017 19/21 4.7 3.4 59.7% 71.7% 49.1% 53.3% 44.6% 62.0% 39.1%
28 2024 36/36 4.7 3.9 60.9% 69.3% 43.7% 60.4% 41.8% 59.3% 36.8% 2018 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.1% 73.5% 47.5% 66.7% 66.7% 61.8% 41.2%
29 2025 35/36 5.6 4.8 60.9% 73.1% 47.4% 52.3% 41.4% 63.1% 37.5% 2019 36/36 3.7 2.7 63.2% 71.1% 52.5% 60.1% 40.7% 64.2% 37.4%
30 2026 39/40 6.8 4.8 62.0% 73.3% 45.7% 64.1% 46.5% 62.9% 38.8% 2020 29/29 4.1 2.5 59.3% 71.4% 51.9% 60.2% 41.1% 63.6% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 45/45 4.1 2.6 62.2% 70.4% 52.1% 64.4% 47.2% 63.5% 37.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 52/53 4.3 2.5 61.6% 71.6% 51.2% 54.9% 46.2% 64.1% 38.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/38 3.9 3.0 59.0% 72.1% 52.8% 61.9% 41.1% 64.1% 36.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 25/27 4.5 4.5 55.5% 70.8% 49.3% 61.2% 32.6% 61.0% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 13/13 3.6 3.1 56.8% 67.8% 47.6% 48.6% 43.1% 59.2% 34.5%
Career — 241/243 6.1 4.2 62.2% 71.7% 47.2% 59.5% 41.0% 62.3% 37.8% — 297/302 4.4 3.1 60.2% 70.8% 51.3% 59.1% 42.5% 63.1% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Daniel Evans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1482 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1465 96.1 -0.67 -0.93 0.265 31.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1442 94.1 +3.68 +2.34 0.549 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.15
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1505 103.0 +1.24 -0.01 1.074 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.12
21 2017 1516 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1490 102.4 +1.09 -0.34 1.014 49.8% — — — 28.6% 0.00 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
22 2018 1492 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1533 112.2 +0.20 -2.14 1.018 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — 0.00
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1692 123.6 -0.35 +1.64 1.058 51.1% -13 — -160 61.1% +0.33 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
24 2020 1480 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1679 121.9 -0.68 -1.14 0.915 48.4% +41 — -157 42.9% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.49
25 2021 1855 136.1 +1.69 +0.20 1.015 50.0% -21 — — 53.2% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.41 2015 1685 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2022 1836 154.1 +0.18 +2.55 1.051 50.8% -34 -42 -60 52.7% +0.19 9–8 (53%) 16–9 (64%) — -1.63 2016 1792 134.4 +0.32 +0.67 0.994 50.2% -18 — -136 53.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.45
27 2023 1793 143.4 -2.02 +2.12 0.976 49.5% +31 -62 -91 44.6% -0.30 10–7 (59%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.41 2017 1820 148.3 -1.83 +2.08 1.029 50.4% +56 -281 — 50.9% +0.03 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.93
28 2024 1779 143.2 -3.37 +1.62 0.904 48.2% +15 -55 -84 38.8% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.47 2018 1787 101.8 -0.92 -0.58 1.078 51.7% — — — 33.3% +0.67 0–1 — — +0.12
29 2025 1715 142.0 -0.75 +1.66 1.018 50.0% +27 -14 — 45.7% -0.22 6–8 (43%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.80 2019 1816 150.4 -0.19 +1.96 1.045 50.6% +43 — -139 51.5% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.00
30 2026 1767 145.3 -1.10 +2.61 1.048 51.1% +45 -62 -125 55.0% +0.31 4–8 (33%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.29 2020 1857 155.8 +0.55 +1.27 1.013 50.3% +40 -315 — 50.6% +0.19 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1836 156.0 +0.36 +0.91 1.016 50.3% +15 -200 -81 51.6% +0.10 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1848 156.2 +0.45 +2.12 1.064 51.0% +43 -209 -129 50.0% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1761 145.7 +0.74 +1.02 1.026 50.3% +32 -100 — 44.4% -0.27 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1708 133.1 -3.07 -0.42 0.891 48.0% +63 -124 — 37.0% -0.90 3–9 (25%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.57
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1726 118.5 -1.93 -0.59 0.845 47.4% -17 — -2 46.9% -0.41 4–0 (100%) 0–2 — -0.22
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1651 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 148.6 -0.94 +1.97 1.004 50.0% +8 -47 -84 48.7% -0.07 38–38 (50%) 61–53 (54%) 105.1 -2.56 — 1927 148.9 -0.19 +1.10 1.000 50.0% +35 -187 -101 48.2% -0.10 47–57 (45%) 60–70 (46%) 97.2 -1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.