H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Dominic Stricker H2H: 2-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Dominic Stricker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2024 Gstaad third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Switzerland
Age 23
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2024* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Dominic Stricker | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2023* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Dominic Stricker | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2022* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dominic Stricker | 6-2 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominic Stricker | #360 | #88 | 685 | 1,820 | 21 | 23 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Dominic Stricker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #246 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #360 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |