H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Dominic Stricker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2024 Swiss Open Gstaad first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Dominic Stricker | Match data | Jul 18, 2024* | R32 | Swiss Open Gstaad | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Dominic Stricker | Match data | Oct 19, 2023* | R32 | Antwerp | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Dominic Stricker | 6-2 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Oct 20, 2022* | R32 | Antwerp | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 120 | 122 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominic Stricker | #273 | #88 | 685 | 1,818 | 21 | 23 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Dominic Stricker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #246 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Dominic Stricker | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1558 | 119.1 | +0.23 | +0.28 | 1.028 | 50.5% | — | +28 | +77 | 62.5% | +0.31 | 0–2 | 6–1 (86%) | — | -0.27 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1654 | 118.7 | +0.62 | +0.44 | 0.986 | 49.6% | -70 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.28 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1803 | 129.4 | +0.80 | +0.57 | 0.989 | 49.3% | -44 | -221 | — | 46.5% | -0.33 | 4–2 (67%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -0.16 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1758 | 122.7 | -0.29 | -0.24 | 0.955 | 48.2% | -3 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.36 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1683 | 111.6 | -0.98 | -1.09 | 0.840 | 47.5% | — | -100 | — | 20.0% | -1.30 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.35 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1686 | 105.6 | -0.87 | -0.01 | 1.091 | 50.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1767 | 145.3 | -1.13 | +2.61 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +45 | -62 | -126 | 55.0% | +0.31 | 4–8 (33%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.94 | +1.97 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -47 | -84 | 48.7% | -0.07 | 38–38 (50%) | 61–53 (54%) | 105.1 | -2.55 | — | 1818 | 128.2 | +0.19 | +0.14 | 0.978 | 49.2% | -33 | -85 | +77 | 45.8% | -0.38 | 8–6 (57%) | 19–14 (58%) | 108.6 | -3.50 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 18, 2024 | H2H |
| Casper Ruud | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Arthur Fils | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 3, 2024 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 31, 2023 | H2H |
| Alexei Popyrin | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |