H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2021 US Open third round 3-6 6-0 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-1 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 6-0 6-2 6-2 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |