H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 1-0

Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2021 US Open third round 3-6 6-0 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Botic van de Zandschulp
Netherlands Age 30 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Facundo Bagnis
Argentina Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Botic van de Zandschulp #112 6-3 6-1 Facundo Bagnis #119 Match data May 9, 2024* Q2 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Botic van de Zandschulp #117 3-6 6-0 6-2 6-2 Facundo Bagnis #80 Match data Sep 5, 2021* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Botic van de Zandschulp #70 #22 1,573 1,933 120 122 49.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Facundo Bagnis #500 #55 985 1,759 45 88 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Facundo Bagnis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #157 1,499 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #237 1,517 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2014 2–3 40.0% #125 1,607 0 0
25 2021 15–10 60.0% #57 1,854 0 0 2015 2–4 33.3% #140 1,562 0 0
26 2022 34–28 54.8% #35 1,836 0 0 2016 6–11 35.3% #56 1,640 0 0
27 2023 20–24 45.5% #50 1,792 0 0 2017 3–12 20.0% #181 1,593 0 0
28 2024 14–22 38.9% #80 1,778 0 0 2018 2–4 33.3% #153 1,633 0 0
29 2025 16–20 44.4% #77 1,715 0 0 2019 2–5 28.6% #137 1,629 0 0
30 2026 21–18 53.8% #70 1,767 0 0 2020 1–4 20.0% #125 1,673 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #76 1,668 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 7–15 31.8% #89 1,643 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 2–9 18.2% #242 1,636 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2024 5–3 62.5% #144 1,648 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2025 1–2 33.3% #398 1,601 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Facundo Bagnis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2021 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2022 18 17 35 51.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2023 15 15 30 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2025 10 13 23 43.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
30 2026 12 9 21 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 76 76 152 50.0% 32 32 64 50.0% 12 14 26 46.2% — 8 22 30 26.7% 37 61 98 37.8% 0 5 5 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 132/133 of Facundo Bagnis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Facundo Bagnis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 2.0 7.0 48.1% 68.3% 47.2% 47.9% 30.0% 57.2% 34.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 4.0 2.0 64.7% 69.3% 51.5% 54.5% 22.9% 63.0% 33.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 5.8 5.0 61.3% 68.0% 46.6% 55.7% 37.6% 59.5% 30.9%
25 2021 25/25 7.0 4.4 62.4% 75.0% 49.1% 62.9% 32.0% 65.1% 35.5% 2015 6/6 3.3 2.7 59.7% 60.4% 49.9% 54.0% 38.5% 55.8% 33.6%
26 2022 62/62 6.5 3.9 63.4% 71.7% 49.1% 59.5% 43.9% 63.1% 38.8% 2016 17/17 3.1 4.2 59.5% 66.0% 48.1% 51.3% 39.0% 58.1% 36.2%
27 2023 44/44 5.7 3.6 62.8% 69.5% 47.5% 58.2% 36.3% 61.1% 38.0% 2017 15/15 5.9 4.3 61.7% 68.1% 45.2% 54.6% 34.5% 59.3% 32.0%
28 2024 36/36 4.7 3.9 60.9% 69.3% 43.7% 60.4% 41.8% 59.3% 36.8% 2018 6/6 5.2 4.0 63.8% 70.7% 55.0% 56.1% 27.1% 64.8% 34.3%
29 2025 35/36 5.6 4.8 60.9% 73.1% 47.4% 52.3% 41.4% 63.1% 37.5% 2019 7/7 3.0 2.1 59.1% 62.4% 51.3% 54.4% 37.8% 58.0% 32.1%
30 2026 39/40 6.8 4.8 62.0% 73.3% 45.7% 64.1% 46.5% 62.9% 38.8% 2020 5/5 4.8 2.4 60.4% 64.5% 55.4% 39.8% 26.2% 60.7% 37.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 5.5 2.9 60.5% 69.6% 49.5% 63.3% 43.3% 61.8% 38.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 22/22 5.5 2.3 62.4% 66.9% 50.7% 57.5% 41.8% 60.8% 38.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 11/11 6.1 2.7 66.3% 61.8% 47.4% 54.7% 35.9% 57.1% 30.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 3.8 1.9 64.3% 67.7% 51.7% 70.7% 45.4% 62.0% 39.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 6.0 1.3 63.7% 68.7% 54.3% 62.7% 43.7% 63.7% 37.3%
Career — 241/243 6.1 4.2 62.2% 71.7% 47.2% 59.5% 41.0% 62.3% 37.8% — 132/133 4.8 3.1 61.6% 66.7% 49.6% 56.7% 38.2% 60.0% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Facundo Bagnis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1501 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 1516 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1500 108.9 -0.66 -2.78 0.812 45.4% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.03
22 2018 1492 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1517 112.0 -0.08 +1.00 0.903 47.6% — +102 — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.29
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1488 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2020 1480 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1607 119.1 -0.79 -0.08 0.764 46.3% — +17 — 35.3% -1.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.10
25 2021 1855 136.1 +1.69 +0.20 1.015 50.0% -21 — — 53.2% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.41 2015 1562 109.1 -3.38 -3.19 0.760 44.7% — +64 — 30.8% -1.38 2–0 0–1 — +0.67
26 2022 1836 154.1 +0.18 +2.55 1.051 50.8% -34 -42 -60 52.7% +0.19 9–8 (53%) 16–9 (64%) — -1.63 2016 1641 128.1 -3.12 -0.39 0.865 47.4% — +74 — 36.1% -0.72 1–0 2–5 (29%) — -0.10
27 2023 1793 143.4 -2.02 +2.12 0.976 49.5% +31 -62 -91 44.6% -0.30 10–7 (59%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.41 2017 1594 127.3 -2.62 -2.67 0.788 46.0% -62 +97 — 28.2% -1.28 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.29
28 2024 1779 143.2 -3.37 +1.62 0.904 48.2% +15 -55 -84 38.8% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.47 2018 1633 121.6 -0.02 -0.66 0.976 48.8% — +66 — 41.2% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.46
29 2025 1715 142.0 -0.75 +1.66 1.018 50.0% +27 -14 — 45.7% -0.22 6–8 (43%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.80 2019 1630 113.6 -2.00 -2.78 0.765 45.8% — +102 — 26.7% -1.53 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
30 2026 1767 145.3 -1.10 +2.61 1.048 51.1% +45 -62 -125 55.0% +0.31 4–8 (33%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.29 2020 1673 120.0 +0.34 +0.61 0.957 48.7% — +68 — 33.3% -0.75 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1669 126.0 -0.76 -0.06 1.007 50.4% -130 +123 — 50.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1644 132.9 -1.83 -0.30 0.974 49.6% -47 +59 — 38.9% -0.48 1–4 (20%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1637 121.0 -3.92 -3.01 0.719 44.9% -49 +88 — 26.9% -1.31 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.05
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1649 125.9 +0.16 +0.66 1.030 50.7% — +120 — 64.7% +0.41 0–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.66
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1602 108.5 -1.57 +0.51 1.028 50.3% — — — 44.4% -0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.03
Career — 1933 148.6 -0.94 +1.97 1.004 50.0% +8 -47 -84 48.7% -0.07 38–38 (50%) 61–53 (54%) 105.1 -2.56 — 1760 127.1 -1.77 -0.93 0.889 48.0% -71 +87 — 38.2% -0.70 16–22 (42%) 19–39 (33%) 92.6 +1.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.