H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Federico Coria in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2024 Estoril Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Federico Coria | Match data | Apr 4, 2024* | R32 | Estoril Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 120 | 122 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Coria | #378 | #49 | 1,063 | 1,714 | 54 | 77 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Federico Coria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #88 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #100 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Federico Coria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 25 | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2022 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 76 | 76 | 152 | 50.0% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | 6 | 24 | 30 | 20.0% | 48 | 49 | 97 | 49.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 130/131 of Federico Coria's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Federico Coria | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% | 2018 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 70.7% | 64.6% | 40.2% | 26.8% | 58.3% | 57.6% | 36.3% |
| 27 | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% | 2020 | 15/15 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 67.6% | 61.1% | 46.4% | 60.1% | 42.9% | 56.4% | 37.5% |
| 29 | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% | 2021 | 32/33 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 63.9% | 62.3% | 50.5% | 52.7% | 40.2% | 58.0% | 37.9% |
| 30 | 2026 | 39/40 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 73.3% | 45.7% | 64.1% | 46.5% | 62.9% | 38.8% | 2022 | 32/32 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 66.7% | 63.3% | 49.7% | 48.8% | 41.6% | 58.9% | 39.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18/18 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 67.8% | 62.0% | 52.1% | 60.3% | 43.2% | 58.8% | 39.9% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23/23 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 66.1% | 63.4% | 44.9% | 50.3% | 43.4% | 56.8% | 39.4% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7/7 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 64.3% | 69.6% | 42.0% | 40.4% | 55.3% | 59.7% | 43.3% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 66.0% | 54.0% | 54.0% | 73.0% | 50.0% | 54.0% | 27.0% |
| Career | — | 241/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.7% | 47.2% | 59.5% | 41.0% | 62.3% | 37.8% | — | 130/131 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 66.1% | 62.9% | 48.5% | 52.3% | 43.0% | 58.0% | 38.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Federico Coria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 | 2017 | 1452 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 | 2018 | 1471 | 103.9 | +0.21 | -2.41 | 0.856 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.07 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 | 2019 | 1466 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 | 2020 | 1625 | 118.5 | -3.72 | -0.58 | 0.858 | 47.1% | -113 | +85 | — | 36.1% | -0.97 | 2–1 (67%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.13 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 | 2021 | 1611 | 130.7 | -3.84 | +0.49 | 0.903 | 48.1% | -122 | +170 | — | 42.2% | -0.49 | 8–3 (73%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.94 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1767 | 145.3 | -1.11 | +2.59 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +45 | -62 | -125 | 55.0% | +0.31 | 4–8 (33%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.28 | 2022 | 1673 | 139.0 | -3.15 | +1.26 | 0.952 | 48.8% | -147 | +80 | — | 41.5% | -0.63 | 8–4 (67%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.46 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1619 | 120.6 | -3.14 | +1.13 | 0.967 | 48.9% | -107 | +104 | — | 39.0% | -0.73 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.50 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1568 | 126.3 | -4.82 | +1.91 | 0.914 | 48.2% | -77 | +85 | — | 36.2% | -0.95 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.44 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1556 | 115.3 | -2.66 | +0.84 | 1.074 | 51.4% | — | +78 | — | 50.0% | +0.05 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | +0.89 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1472 | 94.3 | -1.13 | +2.06 | 0.587 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.24 |
| Career | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.94 | +1.97 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -47 | -84 | 48.7% | -0.07 | 38–38 (50%) | 61–53 (54%) | 105.1 | -2.55 | — | 1714 | 128.5 | -3.59 | +0.88 | 0.926 | 48.4% | -120 | +105 | — | 40.1% | -0.66 | 25–18 (58%) | 19–16 (54%) | 107.8 | +1.82 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Cerundolo | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 19, 2024 | H2H |
| Cristian Garin | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jul 27, 2022 | H2H |
| Matteo Berrettini | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Facundo Diaz Acosta | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 24, 2024 | H2H |
| Alex Molcan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 29, 2024 | H2H |