H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Gregoire Barrere H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Gregoire Barrere in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2021 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
France
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3) | Gregoire Barrere | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2021 | Montpellier | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Gregoire Barrere | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2020 | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Gregoire Barrere | 6-4 7-6(5) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gregoire Barrere | #516 | #49 | 914 | 1,807 | 38 | 64 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Gregoire Barrere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #166 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |