H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Hubert Hurkacz H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Hubert Hurkacz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 6-7(5) 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-7(5) 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Hubert Hurkacz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hubert Hurkacz | #70 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #70 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |