H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2023 US Open first round 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 (ret.) | Jordan Thompson | Match data | Aug 30, 2023* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Thompson | #334 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #79 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #334 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2019 | 16 | 15 | 31 | 51.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2020 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2021 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% |
| 28 | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2022 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 29 | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2023 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% |
| 30 | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2024 | 29 | 16 | 45 | 64.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 77 | 76 | 153 | 50.3% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | 99 | 109 | 208 | 47.6% | 16 | 32 | 48 | 33.3% | 35 | 32 | 67 | 52.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/244 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 319/323 of Jordan Thompson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1/1 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 60.3% | 72.2% | 42.3% | 44.4% | 30.0% | 60.3% | 37.7% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 55.4% | 63.9% | 50.0% | 76.5% | 25.0% | 57.7% | 35.1% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12/13 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 57.2% | 74.6% | 51.4% | 51.0% | 36.2% | 64.5% | 33.3% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26/26 | 6.4 | 2.8 | 60.5% | 68.8% | 45.7% | 52.9% | 36.0% | 59.8% | 36.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11/11 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 67.4% | 63.5% | 40.0% | 54.6% | 33.9% | 56.6% | 34.9% |
| 25 | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% | 2019 | 48/48 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 66.8% | 71.7% | 51.4% | 63.7% | 44.3% | 64.8% | 36.1% |
| 26 | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% | 2020 | 22/22 | 5.2 | 2.0 | 63.3% | 69.6% | 49.4% | 61.2% | 31.2% | 62.0% | 34.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% | 2021 | 42/42 | 7.4 | 2.0 | 58.3% | 72.4% | 50.2% | 54.8% | 35.1% | 63.1% | 34.8% |
| 28 | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% | 2022 | 27/27 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 64.3% | 70.7% | 46.3% | 57.8% | 40.2% | 62.1% | 32.9% |
| 29 | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% | 2023 | 41/41 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 59.8% | 75.1% | 57.5% | 60.6% | 34.9% | 67.8% | 35.5% |
| 30 | 2026 | 40/41 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 62.1% | 73.6% | 45.9% | 65.0% | 46.6% | 63.3% | 38.9% | 2024 | 58/60 | 6.7 | 1.2 | 59.9% | 73.0% | 54.3% | 62.9% | 40.0% | 65.3% | 36.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28/29 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 59.8% | 71.0% | 53.9% | 52.3% | 29.3% | 64.1% | 31.1% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2/2 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 58.0% | 71.0% | 61.0% | 57.0% | 44.5% | 67.0% | 36.0% |
| Career | — | 242/244 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.8% | 47.2% | 59.6% | 41.0% | 62.4% | 37.8% | — | 319/323 | 6.9 | 1.9 | 61.5% | 71.7% | 51.4% | 58.6% | 37.1% | 63.8% | 35.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1500 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1486 | 102.5 | -2.21 | -0.55 | 0.949 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.07 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1474 | 107.0 | +0.43 | -1.25 | 0.830 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.67 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1493 | 120.8 | -0.49 | -1.64 | 0.940 | 48.6% | -2 | — | +60 | 31.4% | -0.97 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.16 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1673 | 144.0 | -1.84 | +0.04 | 0.910 | 48.4% | -28 | -100 | -109 | 41.7% | -0.36 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -0.72 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1549 | 111.8 | -4.44 | -1.25 | 0.804 | 45.8% | +2 | — | +8 | 22.6% | -1.58 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.27 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 | 2019 | 1766 | 146.6 | -0.04 | +0.74 | 1.024 | 50.7% | -45 | -141 | -118 | 52.0% | +0.33 | 11–9 (55%) | 8–16 (33%) | — | +1.12 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 | 2020 | 1758 | 136.7 | -0.96 | -1.83 | 0.896 | 48.2% | +7 | -166 | — | 48.3% | -0.23 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.01 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 | 2021 | 1692 | 125.0 | +0.01 | -1.47 | 0.943 | 49.0% | -26 | -129 | +61 | 46.7% | -0.38 | 10–4 (71%) | 14–8 (64%) | — | +1.58 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 | 2022 | 1688 | 135.7 | -1.27 | -2.32 | 0.868 | 47.7% | -9 | -141 | +44 | 41.1% | -0.64 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.69 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 | 2023 | 1761 | 146.9 | +2.72 | +0.27 | 1.102 | 51.0% | -30 | -293 | +91 | 51.5% | +0.10 | 4–10 (29%) | 14–10 (58%) | — | +0.13 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1779 | 145.0 | -0.76 | +2.63 | 1.057 | 51.2% | +42 | -74 | -137 | 56.3% | +0.39 | 4–8 (33%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -0.06 | 2024 | 1916 | 153.5 | +1.02 | +1.46 | 1.052 | 50.8% | +23 | -420 | -39 | 55.9% | +0.07 | 12–6 (67%) | 18–5 (78%) | — | -0.10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1795 | 131.8 | -0.92 | -2.39 | 0.868 | 47.5% | +40 | -280 | +67 | 46.8% | -0.47 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–3 (70%) | — | -0.98 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1787 | 106.8 | +0.78 | -0.01 | 1.091 | 50.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.12 |
| Career | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.88 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 50.0% | +8 | -49 | -86 | 48.9% | -0.06 | 38–38 (50%) | 62–53 (54%) | 105.3 | -2.45 | — | 1945 | 146.1 | -0.05 | -0.42 | 0.967 | 49.3% | -7 | -216 | +16 | 47.1% | -0.23 | 57–56 (50%) | 77–69 (53%) | 107.3 | +0.28 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 7 | 11 | Aug 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Brandon Nakashima | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 27, 2025 | H2H |
| Casper Ruud | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 31, 2024 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 3, 2024 | H2H |
| Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | 5 | 0 | 5 | May 9, 2025 | H2H |