H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Jordan Thompson H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2023 US Open first round 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 (ret.) | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |