H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Laslo Djere H2H: 0-1
Laslo Djere holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laslo Djere leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2023 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-2 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Laslo Djere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |