H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Mackenzie McDonald H2H: 1-2
Mackenzie McDonald holds a 2–1 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mackenzie McDonald leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mackenzie McDonald won the 2025 Chengdu Open third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
United States
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2025* | Chengdu Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mackenzie McDonald | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2024* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mackenzie McDonald | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2022* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 7-5 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mackenzie McDonald | #140 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,868 | 113 | 146 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Mackenzie McDonald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #673 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |