H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:33 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Nick Kyrgios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2025 BNP Paribas Open first round 7-6 3-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025* | BNP Paribas Open | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-6 3-0 (ret.) | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |